A “Random” Chat between Lars and Evgeny

My friend Lars posted today about something a guy named Evgeny wrote about strolling — in other words: browsing — the web… and in particular, Lars said to Evgeny:

I disagree, profoundly.

Personally, I do not believe in “random walks” — I mean: I do feel as though I go on such walks, but I also believe that there are more or less reasonable explanations that motivate most of my actions. Yet people who do not even feel that they are able to move freely are just as incompetent on any city street or department store as they are with most web browsers — many if not most are not even aware how they can set the browsers homepage, let alone that a browser is today just as much a publishing tool as it is a consumer application. As soon as people fire up a browser window and the browser loads the homepage address from the web, the user is sending a message to the web which says “I’m here and I want to see the website which I consider my homepage” (and quite ironically, I have a hunch that very few people will consider one of their own webpages to be their “home” page).

Strolling in town is always a question of leaving home and interacting socially (probably moreso in Europe than in the United States, because aside from a few exceptions, the United States is simply not “configured” for social interaction).

Indeed, many — if not most — of the people who live in the United States of America are almost completely oblivious to the most basic tool for social interaction: language. Americans all (more or less) speak the same language, so they seem to be as unaware of the significance of language as most are unaware of the air they breathe in and out.

To stroll or to “flaneur” means to use language: When someone says I am doing such-and-such — in a way that others are able to get an impression of what is meant — then others are able to use such expressions to organize ideas about the world… and in the extreme case we might say that it is only by communicating in this way that we form a community.

This is the case whether our interaction is online or offline — but online communications follow more standardized codes (bits, text, and especially ASCII characters) than offline communications (body language, nuanced gestures, vocalization, facial expressions, scents, and so on).

I also disagree… with both Evgeny and Lars. I disagree with Lars because I do not feel he has depicted the free will we have to point our browser wherever we choose to point it… — he has not shown this sufficiently. And yet I disagree with Evgeny even more, because he is such a charlatan that he pretends to criticize the reduction of our actions to limited commercial activities when in fact we are not doing that at all, but Evgeny himself is — because he is actually doing nothing more spewing words in exchange for the cash for his own advertisements, and he is partnering with a company who is also in the advertising business.

Anyone who wants to avoid the parochial commercialism Evgeny laments, can do no better than to stop reading Evgeny’s remarks — except perhaps to stop reading any of the bogus marketing material spewed out daily by such intellectual whores to industrial interests.

Online Nominations Post Forum
Posted in online.name | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

User-Generated Yellow Pages: Post Ratings + Reviews about offers in Saarland + Rheinland-Pfalz @ Gelbe Seiten Saarpfalz

A new local community website for posting online reviews and ratings in the southwest corner of Germany: Gelbe Seiten @ Saarpfalz Blog/IM Zone — try it out! :D

Online Nominations Post Forum
Posted in online.name | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Exploratory Essay on Publishing in the Age of Billions of Online Publishers

Five centuries ago, publishers were venture capitalists. Today, publishing a website that is easily accessible across the globe is well within reach of billions of people — many of whom can hardly be called literate (even by the low literary standards that might have been appropriate many generations ago).

Therefore, today virtually nothing limits the publication of whatever someone might want to publish. Whereas centuries ago — or even just a few years ago — the number of publishers trying to grab any reader’s attention was relatively small, the number is now quite vast. Still: the average number of publishers the vast majority of the online audience currently pays attention to seems to be somewhere around 100.

How has the so-called “attention economy” changed since the advent of online media?

  1. People like to receive attention and will pay for that
  2. People like to receive compliments as a kind of attention — they will reward such attention with their own attention
  3. People like to be entertained — it is also an acknowledgement of their own feelings and therefore by validating these feelings is also a sign of attention
  4. Traditional publishers give authors attention (money or printed books) and the traditional audience gives publishers attention (money) — the exclusive / scarcity market is by and large based on copyright (and/or physically limiting access, e.g. to celebrities)
  5. Web communities show close similarities to traditional academic settings: Members (both authors/academics and audience/students) meet in a limited space and freely exchange ideas in that physical/web space. Attention is rewarded by allowing access to this community / idea marketplace
  6. Web communities are also similar to traditional “free local” press / newspapers / flyers / billboards / outdoor advertising: in all of these cases, reading is free, and these traditional markets normally  identify the so-called target audience geographically (i.e. this is by and large a “one-way” communication, and the people addressed are usually located in a physical, geographic location — e.g. those able to view / see the billboard)
  7. Members of the TV audience are so hungry for entertainment that they are willing to undergo psychological manipulation in exchange for something that appears to be entertaining (and they consider this treatment to be a fair exchange)
  8. Spam consumers are, likewise, so hungry for attention that they cannot recognize the danger of clicking a computer-generated email message

In the context of online publishing, the important takeaway is that the attention market for content has been radically changed. The web let the content scarcity Gini out of the bottle — and after the content scarcity Gini was out of the bottle (and the bottle was empty), the context scarcity Gini jumped inside. So whereas the content market is oversaturated, it’s the context market to which the attention economy is being attracted, and it’s here (among the web domains) that is — and will increasingly be — the place where the valuable wheat will thrive — and it will be separated from the cheap and easy nonsense babble-noise (i.e. the chaff) right at the door. ;)

Online Nominations Post Forum
Posted in online.name | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment